GENEVA
FEBRUARY 6 2009 12:25h
Text
The case centres on an application by British media to the court for the release of evidence the British government about Binyam Mohamed.
The Geneva-based group, whose 60 jurists work to uphold the rule of law, said that the case was undermining accountability for the crime of torture but offered a chance for President Barack Obama's administration to break with the legacy of George W. Bush's "war on terror".
A ruling by two senior British judges on Wednesday accused Washington of threatening to end intelligence cooperation if Britain published full details of the case. Foreign Secretary David Miliband has defended his decision to oppose the release.
The case centres on an application by British media to the court for the full release of evidence the British government held about the treatment of Binyam Mohamed, an Ethiopian-born British resident held at the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay.
In an overnight statement, the ICJ "called on the new U.S. administration to depart from the previous administration's policy and withdraw its objections to the disclosure of the information in the English courts."
"The new U.S. administration has signalled its wish to break decisively with the counter-terrorism policies of the past, including the condoning of torture and ill-treatment, and to reassert the rule of law in counter-terrorism. This case tests the strength of that intent," it said.
Both governments should work together to allow this information to be disclosed, according to the jurists group headed by former Irish President Mary Robinson.
"The Court has made it clear that it considers non-disclosure of the evidence to be inconsistent with the rule of law and democratic values. For it to be forced to act against those principles undermines the role and independence of the courts," the ICJ declared.
The British government and the new U.S. administration must ensure that the independence of the courts, and their ability to disclose information essential to the accountability for crimes of torture, is not undermined by threats to withdraw intelligence co-operation, it said.
The judges said advice from Britain's Foreign Office was that publication of the contested seven paragraphs could lead to reduced intelligence cooperation and prejudice Britain's national security.
In October the Pentagon official overseeing the Guantanamo war crimes court dismissed all charges against Mohamed, who says he falsely confessed to a radioactive "dirty bomb" plot while being tortured in a Moroccan prison.
Comment
Avalanche newest European winter woe


Singer Whitney Houston Dead at 48 in Losa Angeles
Diana Ross attends the annual Clive Davis pre-Gram
Jill Stuart Fall 2012 Collections
Syrians Inspect the damage to their homes
33rd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in Tehr
General strike in Athens, Greece
"HAYABUSA : The long voyage home" openni
Protests continue in Syria
Giffords and Kelly in the Oval Office of the White
will.i.am attends the TRANS4M Boyle Heights benefi



WORLD REPORT
WORLD REPORT
WORLD REPORT