UN/DARFUR
JULY 24 2007 21:14h
Text
Britain and France softened a U.N. resolution on Tuesday that would authorize up to 26,000 troops and police in Darfur.
But Sudan's ambassador, Abdalmahmood Abdalhaleem, still objected to the revised U.N. Security Council draft.
"It's very ugly. It's worse than the first one," he said, prompting Andrew Natsios, the visiting U.S. special envoy for Sudan, to say that Khartoum "should not have veto power."
The new text, obtained by Reuters, also sets a target date of Dec. 31 to transfer authority from the African Union to a joint or "hybrid" AU-UN force that would operate in Sudan's Darfur region, although full deployment is expected to take another year.
Estimated to cost more than $2 billion in the first year, the operation is an effort to quell violence in Sudan's western region where more than 2.1 million people have been driven from their homes and an estimated 200,000 have died.
But it leaves intact a tough mandate, Sudan's biggest complaint, that would allow the use of force to ensure the security of the mission's personnel and humanitarian workers and to protect civilians under threat of physical violence" as well as to seize or collect arms.
Comment
Putin urges population growth
Sarkozy's wife too glamorous for statue


Singer Whitney Houston Dead at 48 in Losa Angeles
Diana Ross attends the annual Clive Davis pre-Gram
Jill Stuart Fall 2012 Collections
Syrians Inspect the damage to their homes
33rd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in Tehr
General strike in Athens, Greece
"HAYABUSA : The long voyage home" openni
Protests continue in Syria
Giffords and Kelly in the Oval Office of the White
will.i.am attends the TRANS4M Boyle Heights benefi



WORLD REPORT
WORLD REPORT
WORLD REPORT