AUTHOR javno100



EMISSIONS TRADING SYSTEM

FEBRUARY 24 2009 19:20h

US Budget To Have CO2 Revenues By 2012-W.House

Text

The European Union is anxious for the United States to develop a trading system to hook up with its own established scheme.

U.S. President Barack Obama's budget accounts for revenues from an emissions trading system in 2012, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said on Tuesday.

"That's true," Gibbs said when asked whether a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases would be in place in time for revenues to be generated by 2012.

The president, a Democrat, has said he wants the United States to take the lead in fighting climate change.

During his presidential campaign Obama laid out plans for a trading system that would set limits on greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and allow factories to trade permits to pollute more.

The European Union is anxious for the United States to develop a trading system to hook up with its own established scheme.

Obama has not released any details about his plans for such a system since taking office, while his administration focused on lifting the country out of recession and shoring up the banking system.

The president has made clear, however, that investments in renewable energy would be part of the economic recovery process.

Shortly after he won the Nov. 4 election, Obama reiterated his commitment to fighting climate change, despite the financial crisis, pledging to "engage vigorously" in global warming talks with other countries.

The White House Web site says Obama plans to implement an "economy-wide cap-and-trade program" to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050.

Comment

bottom
Član obamaistheman
24.02.2009 20:20 h
CO2 Revenues in the White House by 2012 
I could never understand the reasoning behind this. I suppose the idea is the ensure that we do not do more damage to the environment? But, these carbon taxes do not do anything to help. Here is an example. Let us say that an oil company has to pay the carbon tax. Who will end up paying in the long run? The people who use the oil. And we know that consumers are willing to pay a lot of money to drive their cars. In the meantime what has been done to help the environment? Nothing. Or, imagine a company buying carbon tax credits form another company. If I were an oil corporation then would I not want to divide myself into 10 separate corporations and 9 of them would be clean? Only one of them would be "dirty". So, who would I be buying my clean carbon credits from? It would be my clean companies. Who would benefit? It would be my own companies and I would still change the extra monies to the consumer so I win both ways. Is this so hard to understand?
I am afraid that the government does not want to do the right thing when it comes to the environment: enforce standards. That is the true solution to really helping. Also, one country, such as the United States, cannot be enforcing anything if China is building a coal powered plant every two weeks. There has to be a bit of reality here.


Only Club members can comment articles.

Log in or sign in into club. Registration is free.

  Login
  Password